Loading…
21
Appreciation post: I used to just eyeball my polar alignment until a guide scope showed me I was off by almost 2 degrees.
Now I spend the extra 10 minutes with SharpCap's polar alignment tool before every session, and my star trails are basically gone, so what's your go-to method for getting it right fast?
4 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In4 Comments
daniel3915mo ago
My buddy Mark tried the eyeball method for a year, insisting his 30-second subs were fine. Then he imaged the North America Nebula and every star looked like a tiny comma. I showed him SharpCap's tool, and after one 8-minute session his round stars blew his mind. That's the thing, @jenny42, you don't notice the trailing until you compare it to a proper alignment. It's like finally cleaning your glasses after not realizing how smudged they were.
7
the_faith5mo ago
I was totally in Jenny's camp for a long time, figuring close enough was fine. Then I tried a proper polar alignment tool on a whim last winter. The difference in my subs was shocking, even at just two minutes. It completely changed how I spend my setup time because I get way more usable data now. That extra ten minutes saves me hours of trying to fix trailing stars later. I'd never go back to just eyeballing it.
2
craig.olivia3mo ago
Shocking" seems a bit strong, @the_faith, are you sure your old method wasn't just really bad?
4
jenny425mo ago
Two degrees off sounds like a lot but honestly, my old eyeball method got me decent shots for years. The extra ten minutes with a tool feels like overkill unless you're doing super long exposures. I'd rather just start shooting and fix any small drift in post.
1