Shoutout to switching to manual light checks on every job

I used to just grab my digital light meter for all camera checks, but after two cameras came back with weird exposure, I HAD to stop. Now I make myself do a full manual light test with a known good body for comparison. It adds maybe five minutes per repair, but the difference is HUGE. Just yesterday, I had a Pentax K1000 where the manual test caught a sticky shutter curtain my meter said was fine. Catching that before the client picked it up made me feel so SMART. I'm three weeks into this new routine and zero comebacks so far. It's turned into a habit I don't even think about anymore. Honestly, slowing down for that test has made my repairs way more solid. Maybe give it a shot if your meter readings ever seem off.

2 comments

2 Comments

noah_roberts423h ago

Honestly though, that sounds like a ton of extra work for one weird case. Digital meters are right like 99% of the time, and that five minutes per job really adds up over a week. Most of the time you're just confirming what the meter already told you, which feels like busywork. I'd only bother with a manual check if the camera had a known issue or the meter reading looked strange to begin with.

allen.joel7h ago

Wait, your DIGITAL meter said the Pentax shutter was fine? That's actually wild to me. Those things are supposed to catch everything. It's crazy that a physical glitch like a sticky curtain just slides right past the electronics. Makes you wonder what else those meters might be missing on older gear.