F
23

I finally looked at the riverbank where I found my first agate

Back in the day, that stretch of river was full of smooth stones and agate chunks. My dad taught me how to spot the bands of color in the water. Went by last weekend and the bank is all reinforced with concrete now. No more gravel bars to sift through for interesting rocks. It's a bummer how much has been paved over. I still have that first agate on my shelf. Makes me think about what other spots might get lost.
4 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
4 Comments
abbyf79
abbyf7917d ago
Honestly, sometimes that concrete is the only thing keeping the whole bank from sliding into the water. I get the nostalgia, but if the choice is between a stable, safe bank and a pretty gravel bar that washes out every flood, the city's gonna pick the safe one every time. It's not about killing nature, it's about dealing with the reality of erosion and keeping people from getting hurt.
6
the_tessa
the_tessa1mo ago
Concrete over a riverbank? That's just wrong. They keep paving everything and it ruins all the natural charm. Holding onto that first agate is a solid move to keep the memory alive.
2
gavins48
gavins481mo ago
Man, you hit the nail on the head with that. Once they pour concrete, it's like they're killing off any chance for nature to bounce back. That agate isn't just a rock, it's proof of what the place used to be before all this development. Where does it end? Pretty soon every green spot gets turned into a parking lot or a sidewalk. What's the point of 'improving' a place if you just strip away everything that made it special?
1
tara_stone42
In my town, they concreted over the old creek bed two summers ago. Everyone was upset at first, but now it's actually cleaner and fewer people slip on the mud. Sure, it looks less wild, but how many folks actually hung out there before it was fixed? Sometimes a bit of concrete stops the bank from washing away every spring. Keeping that agate is a sweet memory, but not every paving project is a tragedy.
0