13
Hot take: 'just use a contract' is way harder than people admit
I kept hearing from everyone in this forum that a good contract solves everything. Like just slap one together and you're done. Well I spent almost 8 weekends tweaking mine after a deal in Austin went sideways over a clause about inspection deadlines. The buyer backed out on day 89 of a 90 day timeline and I had zero protection because my wording was too vague. People act like you can copy a template and be fine but I went through 4 versions and still missed stuff about earnest money refunds. The real work was figuring out local laws and what actually holds up in court here. Has anyone else had to completely rewrite theirs after one bad experience?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
david_palmer21d ago
Man, I've been there EXACTLY. Spent a full month reworking my whole contract after a buyer tried to claim a non-existent sewer issue on day 85. The trick is to spell out EVERY tiny step about timelines, not just "reasonable time period." I threw in specific dates for inspections, added a hard cutoff for earnest money refunds at 48 hours past the deadline, and it saved my butt twice since. Local real estate attorneys are worth their weight in gold for catching state-specific stuff templates always miss.
4
paulnguyen21d ago
Honestly @david_palmer you nailed it with the specific dates thing. I learned that lesson the hard way after a buyer tried to back out over a "structural issue" that was just old caulk in the bathroom. Now I put exact calendar dates for every single step plus a 24 hour grace period for any delays. The local attorney thing is huge too because generic templates miss stuff like how your state handles title transfers or property disclosure laws. It's boring paperwork but getting it right saves you from those nightmare 11th hour disputes.
6
margaretc4221d ago
Agree completely on the local attorney piece. I had to learn that one the hard way when a generic contract missed a 3 day right of rescission my state requires on all property deals. Specific dates beat "reasonable" every single time too, that vague language just invites arguments.
3